COLUMBUSINSIGHT INSIDER UPDATE English
ColumbusInsight.com Columbusinsight Insider Update
Subscribe
Blog Business Local Politics Tech World

Super Bowl 60 Halftime Show Controversy: Trump and Backlash

Daniel James Walker Mercer • 2026-06-17 • Reviewed by Daniel Mercer

When Bad Bunny stepped onto the Super Bowl LX stage, few expected the performance to become a political flashpoint. But within hours, President Trump had called it “awful,” and social media erupted in a debate that went far beyond music. This article unpacks the controversy, the facts, and what it means for the NFL’s biggest event.

Headliner: Bad Bunny ·
Date: February 8, 2026 ·
Trump’s Reaction: Called it “awful” ·
NFL Apology Allegation: Denied official apology ·
Social Media Sentiment: Polarized

Quick snapshot

1Confirmed facts
  • Bad Bunny headlined the Super Bowl 60 halftime show (ESPN)
  • President Trump publicly criticized the show as “awful” (CBS News)
  • NFL denied sending an apology to Lil Wayne (ESPN) (ESPN)
2What’s unclear
  • Exact viewership numbers for Bad Bunny’s performance have not been released (The Samford Crimson)
  • Whether the NFL privately apologized to Lil Wayne remains unconfirmed (The Samford Crimson)
  • The real impact on Super Bowl ratings compared to previous years is unknown (CBS News)
3Timeline signal
  • Late 2025: NFL announces Bad Bunny as halftime headliner (ESPN)
  • Feb 8, 2026: Halftime show airs; immediate backlash on social media (CBS News)
  • Feb 9, 2026: Trump tweets criticism; Fox News and Yahoo publish critical articles (CBS News)
  • Feb 10, 2026: Rumors of NFL apology to Lil Wayne surface; NFL denies (The Samford Crimson)
4What’s next
  • NFL likely to face continued scrutiny over halftime show selection
  • Debate over worst halftime show may resurface before Super Bowl 61
  • Potential impact on future Spanish-language headliners

Five key details capture the core of the story, from the headliner to the official responses.

Label Value
Headliner Bad Bunny
Date February 8, 2026
Trump Reaction Called it “awful”
NFL Apology Denied
Historical Rank Frequently cited as worst ever

Was the Super Bowl 60 halftime show a success?

Performance reception

Bad Bunny’s set lasted roughly 13 minutes and consisted almost entirely of Spanish-language songs, closing with a “God bless America” message. CBS News described it as “the first to be headlined by a predominantly Spanish-language artist.” Critics on social media immediately called it the worst halftime show ever, though no official Nielsen ratings have been released to confirm viewership.

Critical reviews

  • House Speaker Mike Johnson called the booking a “terrible decision” in October 2025 (ESPN).
  • President Trump posted on Truth Social that the show was “an affront to the Greatness of America” and “a slap in the face” (The Samford Crimson).
  • Some House Republicans reportedly called for an indecency investigation (The Samford Crimson).

Social media reaction

Polarization was immediate. While some viewers defended the performance as a celebration of Latin culture, others echoed Trump’s criticism. ESPN noted that the controversy centered partly on the fact that Bad Bunny performs mainly in Spanish. The phrase “worst halftime show ever” trended on X (formerly Twitter) for several hours after the broadcast.

The divide

The backlash wasn’t just about music. Bad Bunny has openly criticized Trump administration immigration policies, making his Super Bowl stage a proxy for a broader cultural war.

The implication: viewership and approval are measuring different things. Even if the show drew a large audience, the polarized reaction suggests the NFL traded broad appeal for a cultural statement.

What was the controversy over the Super Bowl halftime show?

Cultural divide

The controversy centered on the genre and language of the performance. Bad Bunny’s Latin trap and reggaeton set was seen by critics as a political statement rather than entertainment. CBS News reported that the show included dancers carrying flags of every country in the Americas and a message reading “The only thing more powerful than hate is love.”

Trump’s criticism

President Trump did not wait long to react. According to CBS News, he said, “I’m anti-them,” and declared he would not attend the game. The Samford Crimson reported his Truth Social posts calling the show an “affront to the Greatness of America.”

NFL apology allegations

Rumors soon spread that the NFL had apologized to rapper Lil Wayne for passing him over in favor of Bad Bunny. The ESPN report quoted Commissioner Roger Goodell saying the league would not reconsider the booking, and the NFL officially denied sending any apology. The Samford Crimson noted that Lil Wayne’s camp had expressed disappointment at being overlooked.

The catch

Even if no official apology was sent, the mere rumor signals how high the stakes are: the NFL’s relationship with the hip-hop community was damaged by the choice.

Why this matters: the controversy exposed a rift between the NFL’s attempt at inclusivity and a segment of its audience that sees the halftime show as a patriotic, apolitical event.

What was considered the worst halftime show for the Super Bowl?

Super Bowl 60 vs other worst shows

Bad Bunny’s 2026 performance is frequently ranked alongside the 2011 Black Eyed Peas show as the worst in Super Bowl history. CBS News and ESPN both drew comparisons to previous controversies including Janet Jackson’s 2004 wardrobe malfunction.

The table below compares the most controversial halftime shows.

Year Performer Key Controversy Verdict
2004 Janet Jackson Wardrobe malfunction FCC fines, tape-delay shift
2011 Black Eyed Peas Auto-tune, chaotic staging Widely mocked
2026 Bad Bunny Language, political messaging Often called worst ever

Criteria for worst

Criticism of halftime shows typically falls into three categories: technical quality, cultural tone-deafness, and political overreach. Bad Bunny’s show scored low on all three for its detractors. The performance was entirely in Spanish except for the closing “God bless America,” which some saw as insincere.

Previous controversial shows

  • 2004: Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction” led to FCC fines and a shift to tape-delayed broadcasts.
  • 2011: Black Eyed Peas were widely mocked for auto-tune and chaotic staging.
  • 2020: Shakira and J.Lo were praised for energy but criticized for political messages.
Bottom line: Super Bowl 60’s halftime show is now in the conversation for worst-ever, but that label is as much about politics as performance. For viewers who value entertainment over messaging, the show failed. For those who see the Super Bowl as a cultural battlefield, it succeeded in making a statement.

The pattern: the worst halftime shows are rarely just bad music — they reflect a misalignment between the performer’s identity and the audience’s expectations.

Halftime show views: How many watched Bad Bunny vs Kid Rock?

Bad Bunny viewership

Exact Nielsen numbers for the Super Bowl 60 halftime show have not been published. According to The Samford Crimson, viewership figures are not yet available. Early estimates from media analysts suggest the broadcast likely reached over 100 million viewers globally, given the Super Bowl’s typical audience.

Kid Rock comparison

Kid Rock performed during Super Bowl XXXIX in 2005, which drew an estimated 86 million U.S. viewers. No official comparison can be made until Bad Bunny’s data is released.

Historical viewership trends

Super Bowl halftime shows have grown in audience over time. The 2023 Rihanna show attracted 121 million U.S. viewers. Without confirmed numbers, claims that Bad Bunny’s show was a “ratings flop” remain speculative.

What this means: until the NFL or Nielsen release official data, the narrative that the halftime show was a viewership failure is unsubstantiated. The controversy may actually have boosted interest.

Did the NFL actually apologize for the halftime show?

Alleged apology to Lil Wayne

Shortly after the Super Bowl, unconfirmed reports claimed the NFL had apologized to Lil Wayne for choosing Bad Bunny over him. The Samford Crimson reported that Lil Wayne’s representatives were “disappointed” but did not confirm an apology.

NFL’s official statement

ESPN reported that NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell explicitly stated the league would not reconsider the Bad Bunny booking. A league spokesperson denied any apology had been sent. ESPN called the apology rumor “unfounded.”

Lil Wayne’s reaction

Lil Wayne has not publicly commented on the alleged apology. The rapper was reportedly in talks with the NFL for a future halftime slot, but no deal has been announced.

What to watch

If Lil Wayne later confirms private communication, the NFL’s denial could become a credibility issue. For now, the league’s official stance holds.

The trade-off: by denying the apology, the NFL avoids admitting a mistake — but risks alienating artists who may refuse future offers.

Timeline

  • Late 2025: NFL announces Bad Bunny as Super Bowl 60 halftime headliner (ESPN).
  • February 8, 2026: Halftime show airs; immediate negative reactions on social media (CBS News).
  • February 9, 2026: Trump tweets criticism; Fox News and Yahoo publish critical articles (CBS News).
  • February 10, 2026: Rumors of NFL apology to Lil Wayne surface; NFL denies (The Samford Crimson).
  • Post-Super Bowl: Continued debate over worst halftime show in history.

Clarity: What is confirmed vs what remains unclear

Confirmed facts

  • Bad Bunny headlined Super Bowl 60 halftime show (ESPN)
  • Trump called the show “awful” and “an affront” (CBS News)
  • NFL denied official apology to Lil Wayne (ESPN)
  • House Speaker Mike Johnson called the booking “terrible” (ESPN)

What’s unclear

  • Exact viewership numbers for Bad Bunny’s performance (The Samford Crimson)
  • Whether the NFL privately apologized to Lil Wayne (The Samford Crimson)
  • Whether the performance was a ratings flop compared to previous years (CBS News)
  • Whether House Republicans will formally request an indecency investigation

Quotes from key figures

“It was an affront to the Greatness of America. A terrible choice.”

— President Donald Trump, on Truth Social (reported by The Samford Crimson)

“We will not reconsider the booking. The performance was culturally significant.”

— NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell (ESPN)

“Lil Wayne’s camp expressed disappointment at being passed over.”

— Source close to Lil Wayne, as reported by The Samford Crimson

“I’m anti-them.”

— President Donald Trump, on his stance toward the halftime show (CBS News)

Additional sources

youtube.com, youtube.com

Frequently asked questions

Why did the NFL choose Bad Bunny for Super Bowl 60?

The NFL selected Bad Bunny as part of its efforts to reach a broader, younger, and more diverse audience. According to ESPN, the league saw the Puerto Rican star’s global appeal as a strategic fit.

How long does a Super Bowl halftime show typically last?

Halftime shows usually run between 12 and 15 minutes. Bad Bunny’s set was approximately 13 minutes, consistent with recent shows.

Who else performed during the Super Bowl 60 halftime show?

Bad Bunny was the sole headliner. No other major artists accompanied him, though dancers and flag-bearers were part of the production.

What is the cultural significance of Bad Bunny’s music?

Bad Bunny is a global Latin trap and reggaeton artist whose lyrics often address social and political issues, including immigration. CBS News highlighted that his Super Bowl performance was the first headlined by a predominantly Spanish-language artist.

How does the Super Bowl halftime show viewership compare to the game itself?

The halftime show often draws a larger audience than the game because many viewers tune in specifically for the performance. Nielsen data from past years shows an average increase of 5–10% during halftime.

What other Super Bowl halftime shows have sparked controversy?

Notable controversial shows include Janet Jackson’s 2004 wardrobe malfunction, the Black Eyed Peas’ 2011 auto-tune performance, and Shakira and J.Lo’s 2020 set, which some criticized as too political.

For the NFL, the choice is clear: either continue to prioritize cultural representation and accept the backlash, or retreat to safer, less divisive bookings. The audience they court next year will decide which path the league takes.










Daniel James Walker Mercer

About the author

Daniel James Walker Mercer

We publish daily fact-based reporting with continuous editorial review.